Loatsad: Stakeholders Accuse APCON, LASAA of Regulatory Inadequacies
Once again, the issue of regulatory inadequacies in the nation’s integrated marketing communications industry, especially as it relates to the out-of-home sector is rearing its ugly head. The issue has unashamedly become a recurring decimal with accusations and counter-accusations are being peddled.
Accusing fingers are being pointed in the direction of two key regulators in the industry, the Advertising Practitioners Council of Nigeria (APCON) and the Lagos State Advertisement and Signage Agency (LASAA) for allowing illegal operations and ‘uneven playing field’ in the sector.
Unfortunately, worst hit, seems to be the outdoor advertising, a sub-sector of the industry, whose influence among its peers in the industry, has continued to wane by the day.
Not too long ago, operators and critical stakeholders in the sector were at daggers drawn with the state outdoor regulatory agency, the Lagos State Signage and Advertisement Agency, LASAA, on the activities of JC Decaux, over purported irregularities in its registration.
The state outdoor advertising regulatory agency was also alleged to have given the foreign firm an undue preference, then.
While that case has hardly settled, lately, there has been a ‘loud’ silence, within the industry, regarding the activities of Loatsad Promomedia, an outdoor firm, purportedly owned by Mr. Seyi Tinubu, one of the scions of Ashiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, a political stalwart of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and former governor of the state.
According to industry sources, one of the strong allegations, against the relevant regulatory agencies in the sector, is their reluctance to question the outdoor firm, widely believed to be practising outdoor advertising, without a proper certification from the apex regulatory agency, the Advertising Practitioners Council of Nigeria (APCON). The regulatory agencies are also being accused of turning a ‘blind’ eye to some of the firm’s infractions on the outdoor space in the state, despite its ubiquity and heavy presence in the state’s outdoor space.
For instance, besides having a strong presence in Falomo and Bourdillon areas of Ikoyi on the Lagos Island, the firm’s signages are also a common spectacle on Lekki-Ajah axis of the metropolis. These being some of the most prime outdoor advertising locations in the country.
Another issue being raised against the regulatory authorities, in the state, is that of not making the state’s outdoor space a level-playing field for all practitioners, with some members insisting that Loatsad and a few others have continued to get undue advantage, due to the immense influence their owners wield in the state’s political space.
For instance, spots, hitherto refused other outdoor practitioners in the state, are being consented to the firm to erect its billboards, lamented a practitioner, in a chat with our correspondent.
Not a few in the industry have continued to query the rationale behind the approval of the Lekki Toll Gate signage for the firm. This becomes worrisome as one of the frontline digital centric outdoor agencies in the country, E-Motion, which hitherto enjoyed a franchise over the axis, was not only refused its application for approval for the use of same spot, but had its request turned down.
Another of such infractions, our investigation revealed, was the decision to revoke the clearance earlier given to MediaWorld, another certified outdoor company, to operate on one of the spots on Third Mainland Bridge, only for the same spot to be approved for a foreign firm, believed to be a favourite of the state’s outdoor advertising regulatory agency.
More intriguing is the fact that the company, whose approval was revoked was already getting set to install a high profile LED board , which it had imported, before the approval was suddenly cancelled on the basis of a spurious ‘public safety’ excuse.
Interestingly, why the case has since become a subject of litigation, not a few in the industry have continued to question the rationale behind the state regulatory agency’s volte face, especially after MediaWorld had sunk over N100million on the project.
“You can only talk of a billboard not meeting the required standards, or taking it out for public safety, if it had been installed. The one in question was in the process of being installed. Besides, the same spot was hurriedly handed over to a foreign firm,” lamented the outdoor practitioner who plead for anonymity.
Perhaps, a palpable tension that would take the two key regulatory agencies, in the sector, some effort to douse, is the membership status of Loatsad with APCON.
While APCON has come out to say the outdoor firm is licensed to practice the trade in the country, not a few practitioners would rather take this with a pint of salt.
Responding to BrandCrunch enquiries on the issue, the agency’s Deputy Director, Registration, Career Matters and Corporate Licence Directorate, Mr. Joe-Eugene Onuorah, disclosed that the outdoor firm is duly licensed to practise outdoor, though the firm is currently being queried over exposure of unapproved adverts with the agency.
“Loatsad has a currently valid corporate licence for outdoor advertising. However, it has ongoing issue of exposure of unapproved adverts with APCON,” Onuorah had confirmed, in a text message. Convincing as those explanations might sound, it has not really succeeded in clearing some doubts, among stakeholders in the sub-sector.
“If APCON is saying the company is registered, when did the agency register it; since it’s on record that the agency had been without a board for more than four years now, and it is the statutory function of the board to certify such membership. So who certified this relatively new company?” a stakeholder queried.
Dismissing the allegations, Head, Corporate Affairs, LASAA, Mr. Temitope Akande argued that it was wrong for anybody to have accused the agency of favouritism in the discharge of its statutory duties.
According to him, while it is true that no signage is put in the state’s outdoor ‘s space without the agency’s approval, the agency had always been fair to all, adding that certain factors are usually taken into considerations before such approvals are given.
For instance, on the approval of Lekki Toll Gate LED signage, purportedly owned by Loatsad, after another outdoor firm had been denied the use of the same spot, Akande explained that the corridor belongs to Lekki Concession Company, and the company must give its consent before such spot is approved by the agency.
“You must understand there are various considerations in giving approval. Unless I find out details, I may not be able to talk on this. It might be that the structure they brought there is not suitable for this place or for other reasons, but not because the outdoor firm, Loatsad is being run by an influential person.
“If e-motion is saying they applied for the spot and was not given, we don’t control the pole, it’s LCC that controls the pole. You know there is what we call the consent of the owner of the place before LASAA will approve, and once LCC refuses to give them the consent, we can’t go ahead,” he stated.
He however declined comments on queries on spots, such as Falomo and others, said to have been given to Loatsad, unduly, arguing that some of the cases had become subjects of litigation.
As controversies continue to dog the step of this outdoor firm, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer had explained that the firm was birthed over four years ago to ‘create something that would be innovative and unique’ in the industry. But whether rules are being obeyed in carrying out this task would continue to elicit debates for a long time to come.